As featured July 14, 2012, at www.cnjonline.com
Germs: They do a body good. Finally, a study has surfaced espousing the value of good old dirt and grime and yes, even bacteria.
And
apparently, dirt is even good for kids, especially when carried into
the house by that "nasty ol' dog," if researchers theories are correct.
It's sad, but it happens — the new, precious, squeaky-clean baby arrives and the dog starts getting squeezed out of the picture.
If
lucky, the dog only has to endure more baths than normal, but the less
lucky find themselves looking forlorn through the back window, watching
the family inside the house that used to be theirs too.
There has
for decades been a school of thought that children needed to be
sheltered from germy animals or they might get sick or even develop
allergies and other long-term issues.
However, gaining widespread
attention this week, a soon-to-be released article in the Journal of
Pediatrics just might vindicate back-porch pooches.
Essentially, a
team of Finnish researchers studied babies over the course of their
first year and found that those living in households with pets had lower
incidents of infection and in general showed higher resilience when
they did become sick.
Not only was there a marked difference for
kids in homes with pets, but the more contact they had with the animals,
the better their immunity seemed to be and even more, there was a
noticeable difference in kids that lived around dogs, particularly dogs
that spent significant time outside.
While the reason was not scientifically explained in the study, researchers have said they have a theory and it's pretty simple.
Dogs are just a tad dirtier than cats and therefore, more likely to carry the icky stuff into the house on their paws and fur.
The
information is consistent with other studies in recent years, which
lean toward exposure to indoor pets in the early years as helpful to
reducing allergies and sensitivities later in life.
A 2010 article
in the Journal of Pediatrics looked at the link between child eczema
and pets and a team of doctors concluded that while there's still much
work to be done on the topic, it's probably not fair to blame the dog.
In fact, they noted researchers have found exposure to pets in the early
years could actually protect a child from developing eczema at rates of
20-30 percent.
It almost seems silly that a study is needed to
show that kids need animals, but hey, if it takes science to prove it
then so be it.
The dogs and kids already have it all figured out anyway — they know they are made for each other.
Heck, they even share the same interests.
They
both like squeaky toys and stuffed animals, they are close to the
ground, have vacuum tendencies when they encounter things on the carpet,
and they could care less about dirt — in fact they kind of seem to like
it.
Turn your back for second, and Fido and Junior will be licking the same rawhide or dipping their noses in the same water dish.
Come
to think of it, choking hazards notwithstanding, maybe it's a partial
explanation for why little kids have to touch and taste everything,
something well-intentioned parents keep interfering with even as the
list of conditions and ailments out there seems to grow daily.
Who
knows, future studies may even find that nature has hard-wired kids
without an ick-meter for the purpose of helping them build immunity.
Actually,
when you look at it like that, perhaps an equally appropriate study
would be to measure how living in a home with a child impacts a dog's
health.
No comments:
Post a Comment